


Table 1. The observed spread-winged displays of Bubo bengalensis in the wild
|
Sno |
Display |
Morphological description |
Employed by |
Observed stimulus |
Observed function |
Remarks |
|
1 |
Intimidatory Display (Images 1 & 2) |
A display with the face of the wings held perpendicular
to the perched substrate and bent at the elbow and wrist. On being confronted by intruders, the
owl stared fixedly at them, leant forward, swayed from foot to foot, swelled
feathers to their full extend and opened the wings outwards. Loud hissing and bill clapping
enhanced the appearance of ferocity |
Young over 15 dayÕs old |
Human approach |
The action was a bluff, the intent being to keep
intruders at bay. A diversionary
tactic which allowed the young to make good their escape either by running or
flying away |
An inter-specific display used to deter intruders |
|
2 |
Threat Display (Image 3) |
A display with the face of the wings held parallel to
the perched substrate |
Adults |
Used against conspecifics – viz., territorial male
against intruders and females to repel males outside the breeding season |
To deter conspecifics. This was no bluff, the intent
being to scare off the other owl, and if stimulus persisted, the displaying
bird would attack unhesitatingly |
An intra-specific display used against other owls in the
wild |
|
3 |
Intermediate agonistic displays (Images 7 & 8) |
These are displays with the wings held intermediate
between the intimidatory and threat displays. Many intensity phases exist,
often with one wing behaving differently from the other. These are not transition phases
between the intimidatory and threat displays, and have never been observed to
progress from one to the other. In fact they have their own set of
progression (as is evident from Images 4-11) |
Brooding female in defence of nest / young |
Human approach of nest |
To deter intruders |
These are inter-specific displays which were earlier
confused with the intimidat-ory display (Ramanu- jam 2004, 2007). Now with detailed photogra-phic
ethogra-ms their morphol-ogical differen-ces have come to light |