Table: 1 Proportional abundance of different Species
|
|
Species |
Proportional Abundance |
|
1 |
Aphodius campestris Mittal |
0.51 |
|
2 |
Onthophagus falsus Gill. |
0.15 |
|
3 |
Aphodius lividus (Oliv.) |
0.07 |
|
4 |
Onthophagus
quadridentatus (Fabricius) |
0.05 |
|
5 |
Caccobius vulcanus (Fabricius) |
0.04 |
|
6 |
Onthophagus catta (
Fabricius) |
0.04 |
|
7 |
Caccobius ultor (Sharp) |
0.03 |
|
8 |
Aphodius urostigma Harold |
0.03 |
|
9 |
Oniticellus pallens (Oliv.) |
0.02 |
|
10 |
Drepanocerus sinicus Harold |
0.01 |
|
11 |
Oniticellus pallipes (Oliv.) |
0.01 |
|
12 |
Onthophagus mopsus (Fabricius) |
0.01 |
|
13 |
Gymnopleurus miliaris (Fabricius) |
0.01 |
|
14 |
Gymnopleurus parvus (MacL.) |
0.01 |
|
15 |
Onthophagus bonasus (Fabricius) |
0.01 |
|
16 |
Drepanocerus setosus (Wied.) |
0.004 |
|
17 |
Aphodius liesenfeldti Petrov. |
0.004 |
|
18 |
Onthophagus ramosellus Bates |
0.003 |
|
19 |
Rhyssemus germanus ( L.) |
0.002 |
|
20 |
Onitis philemon Fabricius. |
0.001 |
|
21 |
Onthophagus centricornis (Fabricius) |
0.001 |
|
22 |
Oniticellus spinipes Roth. |
0.001 |
|
23 |
Hybosorus orientalis Westw. |
0.001 |

Figure 1. Proportional abundance
distribution of different species in rank abundance curve

Figure 2. Temporal variations in the % species richness and
abundance