Intertidal Foraminifera of Indian coast - a scanning electron photomicrograph-illustrated catalogue
G. Subhadra Devi 1 & K.P. Rajashekhar 2
1,2 Department of Applied Zoology, Mangalore University, Mangalore, Karnataka 574199, India
Present Address: 1 Depatrment of Zoology, Carmel College for Women, Nuvem-Salcete, Goa 403601, India
Email: 2 (Corresponding author) firstname.lastname@example.org
The diversity of marine life is being affected dramatically due to many causes. Increased atmospheric CO2 emission leads to its increased dissolution in ocean water causing acidification. Such anthropogenic ocean acidification exerts a great impact on calcifying organisms (Orr et al. 2005). Foraminifera (forams) are one such shell-secreting group. Among the many marine taxa that are surveyed for their diversity, there is a bias towards commercially important organisms and higher vertebrates (Nee 2004). Protists are one of such groups which are least studied, despite being diverse and abundant. Foraminifera or forams in short are the most abundant, diverse and widely distributed Protists in the marine realm. The estimated living species are about 10,000 (Vickerman 1992). Of these, about 40 species are planktonic and the rest are benthic. Foraminifera are found in all marine environments (Todo et al. 2005). Diversity of Foraminifera is highest in tropical waters and gradually declines towards poles (Brasier 1980). The distribution of Foraminifera is not random, but is controlled by environmental gradient. The factors which influence their distribution and abundance include bathymetry, sediment texture, and physicochemical characteristics of sediment as well as water. Therefore, these organisms provide one of the best sources of proxy oceanic and climatic information.
The calcareous test of forams that protects the single cell incorporates important physico-chemical properties of the ambient environment during the life and gets preserved after the death of the organism. The tests are built of hollow chambers separated by partitions, with small openings called foramina that connect the chambers. Due to their tests, forams have a good potential to be fossilized. They are the most widely used fossil organisms for biostratigraphy and age dating. Abundance, species richness, species assemblage, test morphology and chemical composition of tests of foraminifera have been used to interpret palaeoenvironmental conditions, such as global sea level variations (Anthony et al. 2006), palaeomonsoons (Weldeab et al. 2007), palaeodepth (Nigam & Henriques 1992), palaeotemperature (Zachos et al. 2005), tsunami (Gadi & Rajashekhar 2007), pollution studies (Debenay et al. 2001). Benthic foraminifera have proved to be good indicators of methane releases in marine environment (Hill et al. 2003). Scott et al. (2001) have emphasized the importance of foraminifera in monitoring coastal environment.
The recent reviews of Bhalla et al. (2007) and Khare et al. (2007) on foraminiferal studies in near shore regions of western and eastern coasts of India reveal that most of the studies are related to taxonomic and ecological aspects and palaeoenvironmental interpretations. A few studies have been undertaken along the eastern coast of India on applied aspects of Foraminifera. Taxonomic and ecological studies on foraminifera from west coast of India were carried out by some researchers. Bhalla & Nigam (1979) and Bhalla & Gaur (1987) worked on foram diversity of Calangute and Colva beach sands respectively. Bhalla & Raghav (1980) studied the ecology of Foraminifera of Malabar coast and suggested that salinity is the chief governing factor. Raj & Chamyal (1998) studied the ecology of foraminifera of Mahi valley of Gujarat. Shareef & Venkatachalapathi (1988) reported 40 and 41 species of foraminifera from Bhatkal and Devgad islands, respectively. Nigam (2005) addressed the question as to how environmental issues can be solved through Foraminifera. Some studies were carried out on taxonomy and ecology of Forminifera from beaches and estuaries of east coast of India. Foraminiferal diversity in relation to different ecological conditions was reported by Bhalla (1968) from Vishakhapatnam beach sands, Hamsa (1973) and Kathal & Bhalla (1998) from Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar, Narappa et al. (1981) from Godavari river system, and Kathal et al. (2000) from Kanyakumari, and Satyanarayana et al. (2007) from Nagapattinam. Very scanty literature is available on Foraminifera of Lakshadweep (Gupta 1973; Rao et al. 1987; Saraswati 2007). To utilize these marine protists efficiently, adequate knowledge of their diversity and distribution pattern in modern environment is of utmost importance. Therefore, a study of intertidal forams was undertaken comparing the east and west-coast and the sensitivity of forams to monsoons. This paper presents the scanning electron photomicrographs of inter tidal forams along the Indian coast, so as to benefit researchers in diverse areas who use Foraminifera.
India has a coastline of 7,517km. The West and East coasts of India exhibit a number of dissimilarities in terms of oceanography. Bathymetry of the West Coast shows that the continental shelf is narrow and broadens northwards off the Gujarat coast. The continental shelf of the east coast is much narrower than the West Coast. The West Coast is characterised by heavy surf, rocky shores and sandy beaches. The rivers, which originate in the Western Ghats are short and rapid and westward flowing into Arabian Sea, forming estuaries rather than deltas. The elevation of the Eastern Ghats is lower than that of the Western Ghats. Most of the rivers flow eastwards, form deltas and discharge into the Bay of Bengal. The west coast experiences intense upwelling during southwest monsoon which brings the nutrients from deeper waters to upper ocean. The east coast is characterised by a weak upwelling during the northeast monsoon. Sea surface temperatures of Bay of Bengal are 1.5 to 2.00C higher than that of Arabian Sea. The salinity of the upper water column is more in the Arabian Sea than in Bay of Bengal. These dissimilarities are expected to provide variations in ecological conditions influencing foraminiferal distribution and their diversity. Hence the following sites of west- and east coasts of were chosen for the present study.
West Coast of India
The following 8 sites of west coast of India were chosen for the present study (Figure 1):
1. Juhu beach, Mumbai, (W1), is on the west coast of India, in Maharashtra on the eastern shore of the Arabian Sea. The location is highly polluted and has considerable organic matter input.
2. Malvan (W2) is located in Sindhudurg District of Maharashtra. This site is less polluted and is partly a rocky beach.
3. Baga (W3) is a beach and has large grain sediments and has lesser clay. It is situated along the north Goa coast.
4. Calangute (W4) beach extends for 7km, stretching along the north Goa coast.
5. Majorda (W5) is a part of 30km long stretch of uninterrupted beach from Velsao to Cavellossium in South Goa.
6. Ankola - Belikeri beach (W6) is situated 8km away from Ankola it is pristine and less impacted by anthropogenic activities.
7. Murudeshwar beach (W7) is wide and long, dotted with occasional rocks. The gradient of the shore is shallow.
8. Kozhikode - Beypore (W8) beach is located about 10km south of Kozhikode town at the mouth of the Chaliyar River in North Kerala. It is a site that is influenced by estuarine conditions.
9 Amini (W9)is one of the islands of Lakshadweep Archipelago. The unique feature of the Amini island is that it is encircled by a lagoon. The depth of the lagoon varies from 1.0- 2.5m.
10. Kochi - Cherai beach (W10) is a beach in the Cherai village. The beach has a narrow water way formed due to Vypeen Island.
11. Kollam (W11) is a shore with a steep gradient.
12. Shankhumugham (W12) is close to the southern tip of the peninsula and is a shallow water sandy beach near Thiruvananathapuram.
The following sites were chosen for the present study (Figure 1):
1. Bali Island is one of the islands of Sunderbans (E1). The Indian Sundarbans at the apex of the Bay of Bengal is a deltaic complex of approximately 426,300ha formed by the depositional activities of the Ganges and the Brahmaputra. A group of 108 islands and a dense network of rivers, canals and creeks comprise the area. The intertidal zone of Bali island registers a gradual change in the textural characteristics from high water level to low level, indicating a sediment change from sandy to silty and clay nature
2. Digha (E2) is in Purba Medinipur district of West Bengal. It is located 187km away from Kolkata. Digha has considerable amount of clay.
3. Paradwip (E3) is located on the Bay of Bengal and is sandy.
4. Puri (E4) beach is long and wide extending for miles and is uninterrupted by rocky outcrops.
5. Bheemunipatnam beach (E5) is about 25km from Vishakhapatnam. This beach is located at the mouth of the river Gosthani in Andhra Pradesh.
6. Vishakhapatnam - Ramakrishna beach (E6) is a long stretch of beach with brown sands in Andhra Pradesh.
7. Chennai - Besant Nagar beach (E7). Here, the river Adyar meets the sea. It has impact of a populated city on it and is influenced by Adyar river discharge.
8. Nagapattinam (E8) is a long stretch of beach in Tamil Nadu. The width of the continental shelf of the coast near Nagapattinam is narrow.
9. Rameswaram (E9) is an island in the Gulf of Mannar at the very tip of the Indian peninsula. The island is spread in an area of 61.8km2.
10. The southernmost tip of the Rameswaram island is called Dhanushkodi (E10). It is 18km away from Rameshwaram.
The sites studied thus include locations that are estuarine or influenced by human habitat while some are pristine.
Intertidal sediment samples were collected during a period of two years, from October 2004 to September 2006. Samples were dried at 600C and soaked in water overnight to remove salts. The sediments were treated with 10% Sodium hexa-meta-phosphate overnight to dissociate clumped aggregates. To disintegrate the organic matter the samples were treated with 5ml of hydrogen peroxide. Afterwards, the samples were washed through a 63µm (230 ASTM) sieve under low water pressure. The sand fraction was collected and dried at 600C. Finally dried samples were examined for foram specimens. Individual, intact species were isolated under Olympus SZ 11 stereomicroscope. Individual specimens were mounted on brass stubs (0.5mm diameter) using double-sided adhesive carbon tape and coated with gold for about 2 minutes (SPI-Module Gold Sputter Coater). Specimens were observed using JEOL JSM-5800VS scanning electron microscope.
To identify live specimens, samples fixed in 70% alcohol were stained with Rose Bengal (Walton, 1952). The species were identified and classified by following Loeblich & Tappan (1987). Recent literature by various authors was also considered for identification. Diagnostic morphological features of the tests such as shell ornamentation, chamber arrangement and shape and position of aperture were considered for identification of species.
A list of Foraminifera recorded in the present study from the inter-tidal regions of Indian Coast including Amini island of Lakshadweep along with their taxonomic status is reported in Table 3. Images SEM 1-13 of scanning electron microphotographs reveal the morphological features of the tests of Foraminifera recorded in the present study. The study revealed the occurrence of 151 species of Foraminifera belonging to 65 genera, 41 families and 7 suborders. All foraminiferal species belong to the order Foraminifera under Protista. Among the seven suborders, Rotaliina was represented by maximum number of species 72 belonging to 36 genera and 21 families. Rotaliinids have calcareous multilocular tests. The suborder Miliolina was found to be second in species richness with 59 species belonging to 13 genera and 8 families. In this suborder the tests of the foraminiferal species are porcelaneous. Textularina was represented by 10 species. They belong to 9 genera and 7 families. They have agglutinated tests. Under the suborder Lagenina 4 species belonging to 2 genera and 2 families were recorded. Tests are monolamellar. Globigerinina was represented by 4 species of planktonic Foraminifera belonging to 3 genera and 1 family. Tests are calcareous and hyaline in nature. The suborders Involutinina and Robertinina were represented by single species, single genus and single family. Presence of calcareous tests with tubular second chamber is the characteristic feature of the sub order Involutinina. Tests are planispirally to trochospirally enrolled in Robertinina. Out of 151 species, only 4 were planktonic and the remaining were benthic forms. The number of species found in each site is provided in Table 2. The occurrence of individual species in each site surveyed is provided in Table 3. The variations between the west- and east-coast are due to variations in the physicochemical properties between Arabian and the Bay of Bengal. A detailed account of these differences is provided elsewhere (Gadi & Rajashekhar, Communicated). Clear, Monsoon related fluxes in diversity do occur in some species.
The assemblage of Foraminifera as observed in the present study reveal the following important points. The diversity of foraminifera depends largely on the ecological conditions at a site. The latitude being the same, they differ considerably between the West and East coasts of India. The dominant species however are the same, though their ranking in abundance differs. The relative density and diversity of forams differs between East and West coast. Observations suggest occurrence of morphogroups. The assemblage differs considerably from regions studied and reported from elsewhere and it also differs from other tropical sites where comparable studies have been undertaken (Javaux & Scott 2003). However, near shore forams of other regions are comparable to the assemblage found in the present study. Studies on fossil forams carried out by Talib & Gaur (2008) in Jumara Dome, Kutch, India revealed 51 species. Comparison of our observations with that of Talib & Gaur (2008) shows that the present day fauna is considerably different than the fauna of forams of the Oxfordian age (~160 Myr) and suggests rapid speciation.
We have developed an SEM illustrated catalogue for future reference and comparison as Arabian Sea has good prospects of natural gas and oil deposits, for survey of which fossil forams are used. Robust and well defined SW monsoons are also a characteristic climatic feature that influences Arabian Sea. The SEM images obtained in the present study will facilitate researchers in proper identification of foraminiferal species. The surface characteristics revealed will help morphological analysis from polluted areas and regions affected by high energy waves. The present study gives an overview of the foram diversity and records the dominant species found along the Indian coast. Environmental conditions and the subtleties of variations in oceanography of Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal are reflected in their distribution.
Anthony, C., W. Massey, R. Gehrels, D.J. Charman & S.V. White (2006). An Intertidal foraminifera-based transfer function for reconstructing holocene sea-level change in Southwest England. The Journal of Foraminiferal Research 36: 215-232.
Bhalla, S.N. (1968). Recent foraminifera from Vishakhapatnam beach sands and its relation to the known foramgeographical provinces in the Indian Ocean. Bulletin, National Institute of Science, India 376-392.
Bhalla, S.N. & K.N. Gaur (1987). Recent foraminifera from Colva beach sands, Goa. Journal of Paleontological Society 32: 122-130.
Bhalla, S.N., N. Khare, D.H. Shanmukha & P.J. Henriques (2007). Foraminiferal studies in near shore regions of western coast of India and Laccadives Islands: A review. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 36: 272-287.
Bhalla, S.N. & R. Nigam (1979). A note on recent foraminifera from Calangute beach sands, Goa. Bulletin Indian Geological Association 12: 239-240.
Bhalla, S.N. & K.S. Raghav (1980). Recent foraminifera from beach sands of Malabar coast. Indian Journal of Marine Science 9: 288-290.
Brasier, M.D. (1980). Microfossils. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., Publications, 90-121pp.
Debenay, J.P., E. Geslin, B.B. Eichler, W. Duleba, F. Sylvestre & P. Eichler (2001). Foraminiferal Assemblages in a Hypersaline lagoon, Araruama (R.J.) Brazil. The Journal of Foraminiferal Research 1: 133-151.
Gadi, S.D. & K.P. Rajashekhar (2007). Changes in inter-tidal foraminifera following tsunami inundation of Indian Coast. Indian journal of Marine sciences 36: 35-42.
Guptha, M.V.S. (1973). A preliminary report on theforaminiferal assemblages from the lagoon sediment of Kavaratti Atoll (Laccadives). Indian Journal of Marine Science 42:781-782.
Hamsa, A.K.M.S. (1973). Foraminifera of the Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar. Journal of Marine Biological Association 14: 418-423.
Hill, T.M., J.P. Kennett & H.J. Spero (2003). Foraminifera as indicators of methane-rich environments: A study of modern methane seeps in Santa Barbara Channel, California. Marine Micropaleontology 49: 123-138.
Javaux, E.J. & D.B. Scott (2003). Illustration of modern benthic foraminifera from Bermuda and remarks on the distribution in other subtropical/tropical areas. Palaeontologia electronica, 6:29pp electronic version: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2003_1/benthic/benthic.pdf
Kathal, P.K. & S.N. Bhalla (1998). Recent foraminiferal thanatocoenoses from the Gulf of Mannar, India. Neus Jaharbuch Geologie und Paleontologie 207: 419-431.
Kathal, P.K., S.N. Bhalla & R. Nigam (2000). Foramgeographical affinities of the west and east coasts of India: An approach through cluster analysis and comparison of taxonomical, environmental and ecological parameters of Recent foraminiferal thanatotopes. Bulletin, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation of India 37: 65-75.
Khare, N., S.K. Chaturvedi & A. Mazumder (2007). An overview of foraminiferal studies in near shore regions off eastern coast of India and Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 36: 288-300.
Loeblich, A.R. Jr. & H. Tappan (1987). Foraminiferal genera and their classification. Von Nostrand Rinhold, New York, 970pp.
Narappa, K.V., M.S. Rao & M.P. Rao (1981). Living foraminiferida from the estuarine complex of the Gautami and Nilareva distributaries of River Godavari Part 1. Living populations in relation to ecological factors. Proceedings of the IX Colloquium on Micropalaeontology and Stratigraphy: 49-68.
Nee, S. (2004). More than meets the eye: Earth’s real biodiversity is invisible. Nature 429: 804-805.
Nigam, R. (2005). Addressing environmental issues through foraminifera – Case studies from the Arabian Sea. Journal of Paleontological Society 50: 25-36.
Nigam, R. & P.J. Henriques (1992). Planktonic percentage of foraminiferal fauna in surface sediments of the Arabian Sea (Indian Ocean) and a regional model for paleodepth determination. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology 91: 89-98.
Orr J.C, J.F. Victoria, A. Oliver, B. Laurent, C.D. Scott, A.F. Richard, G. Anand, G. Nicolas, I. Akio, J. Fortunat, M.K. Robert, L. Keith, M.R. Ernst, M. Richard, M. Patric, M. Anne, G.N. Raymond, K.P. Gian, B.R. Keith, L.S. Christopher, L.S. Jorge, S. Reiner, D.S. Richard, J.T. Ian, F.W. Marie, Y. Yasuhiro & Y. Andrew (2005). Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437: 681-685.
Raj, R. & L.S. Chamyal (1998). Microfauna from a middle Holocene terrace lower Mahi Valley, western India. Journal of Paleontological Society 43: 59-71.
Rao, K.K., P. Sivadas, B. Narayanan, K.V. Jayalakshmy & M.K. Kutty (1987). Distribution of foraminifera in the lagoons of certain island of the Lakshadweep Archipelago, Arabian Sea. Indian Journal of Marine Science 16: 61-178.
Satyanarayana K., A.N. Reddy, B.C. Jaiprakash, L. Chidambaram, S. Srivastava & D.K. Bhattacharya (2007). A note on foraminifera, grain size clay mineralogy of Tsunami sediments from Karaikal-Nagore-Nagapatnam beaches, southeast coast of India. Journal of Geological Society, India 69: 70-74.
Saraswati, P.K. (2007). Symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera of Lakshadweep. Indian Journal of Marine Science 36: 351-354.
Scott, D.B., F.S. Medioli & C.T. Schafer (2001). Monitoring of Coastal Environments Using Foraminifera and Thecamoebian Indicators. Cambridge University Press, 176pp.
Shareef, N.A. & V. Venkatachalapathy (1988). Foraminifera from shore sands of Bhatkal and Devgad Islands, west coast of India. Journal of Geological Society of India 31: 432-441.
Talib, A. & K.N. Gaur (2008). Foraminiferal composition and age of the Chari Formation, Jumara Dome, Kutch. Current Science 95: 367 - 373.
Todo, Y., H. Kitazato, J. Hashimoto & A.J. Gooday (2005). Simple foraminifera flourish at the ocean’s deepest point. Science 307: 689.
Vickerman, K. (1992). The diversity and ecological significance of Protozoa. Biodiversity and Conservation 1: 334-341.
Walton, W.R. (1952). Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, 3: 56-60.
Weldeab, S., D.W. Lea, R.R. Schneider & N. Anderson (2007). 155000 years of West African monsoon and ocean thermal evolution. Science 316: 1303-1307.
Zachos, J.C., U. Rohl, S.A. Schellenberger, A. Sluijs, D.A. Hodell, D.C. Kelly, E. Thomas, M. Nicolo, I. Raffi, L.J. Lourens, H. McCarren & D. Kroon (2005). Rapid acidificaition of the ocean during the palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Science 3008: 1611-1615.